Comparing Wisconsin’s And Michigan’s Bear Management Programs. Concern Over Michigan Bear Population Numbers : Black Bear Blog
Top

Comparing Wisconsin’s And Michigan’s Bear Management Programs. Concern Over Michigan Bear Population Numbers

March 16, 2010


Guest post by Rich Hare.

I have an update for you contrasting conditions leading to Wisconsin closing their bear season in 1985, and conditions in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula right now, in 2010.

Wisconsin’s bear season was closed in 1985 due to over harvest from 1981 through 1984. According to former Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Manager, Mike Gappa…biologists were concerned over the high percentage of bears 3 years of age and younger (48.5%) being harvested. Baits used for bear population census also identified a serious decline in the state’s bear numbers. They estimated the statewide population to be less than 7,000 bears. With full support from the Wisconsin Bear Hunters Association, WDNR went to the state legislature and got approval to close the bear season and revamp the state’s bear management program.

Contrast between Wisconsin in 1985 and Michigan in 2010 is alarming. Less than a year ago MDNRE estimated the statewide bear population to be about 19,000 including cubs. CCARE (Concerned Citizens Against Resource Exploitation…a pro hunting, fishing & trapping organization) received a letter from MDNRE’s lead fur bearer biologist, Adam Bump on 1/28/10 advising the statewide bear population had been revised down to 11,100 bears excluding cubs. The 11,100 was the estimate prior to the 2009 bear season. 2,026 bears were harvested in 2009…further reducing the estimate to 9,074 excluding cubs. Back in 1985 Wisconsin’s estimated statewide bear population was at about .5 bears per square mile. In 2010, Michigan’s estimated bear population in the Upper Peninsula, using the very generous number of 9,000 bears in the UP… figures out to be .5 bears per square mile. In Michigan’s Upper Peninsula the percentage of bears 3 years and younger being harvested is currently at 68.6%! Wisconsin’s DNR was alarmed when bears 3 and under was at 48.5%. To quote one of Wisconsin’s bear biologist’s, “that ought to throw up a red flag to somebody.” Yet, MDNRE’s Wildlife Division proposes issuing 12,375 kill tags for a bear population of 9,074 bears excluding cubs (cubs are not fair game in Michigan).

Concerned Michigan sportsmen need to contact the Natural Resources Commissioner representing their region and tell them to get back to managing the state’s natural resources using sound science.

Rich Hare
Ontonagon, Mi

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Related Articles

Comments

8 Responses to “Comparing Wisconsin’s And Michigan’s Bear Management Programs. Concern Over Michigan Bear Population Numbers”

  1. Comparing Wisconsin's And Michigan's Bear Management Programs … Tools on March 16th, 2010 7:43 pm

    [...] Comparing Wisconsin's And Michigan's Bear Management Programs … Myth 10: Europe is turning into 'Eurabia' while its own population …Cougar Population Concerns ResidentsCHOICE calls for new supermarket industry ombudsman | Australian …Biggs is solid choice | WE Blog | Wichita Eagle BlogsBSNL drops its plan to acquire a majority stake in Zamtel …Hot Air » Blog Archive » What I said at the Kill the Bill RallyWolf population growing, but slowly – Care2 News NetworkHot Air » Blog Archive » NARN, the Kill Bill: Volume II Editionhttp://loansmblog.co.cc/ » Blog Archive » Loans for unemployedSB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Arizona Diamondbacks, A Return To … View the Contact Powered by Tools [...]

  2. New Jersey Real Estate Report » NJ Home Buyer Credit? Misguided … | Jefferson County FL Real Estate on March 16th, 2010 10:50 pm

    [...] Comparing Wisconsin's And Michigan's Bear Management Programs … [...]

  3. Computer Network Engineering Programs | Defecational | Computer Engineering Addict on March 17th, 2010 3:50 am

    [...] Comparing Wisconsin's And Michigan's Bear Management Programs … [...]

  4. Jim Richards on March 17th, 2010 8:57 am

    Giving out more tags than there are Bears is a common thing with the fish and game. It’s the same with Elk or Deer as well. It’s all about the money.
    As far as bears three years and younger being up to 68% of the harvest is because they are the ones who come to a bait first. Young bears want to get in and out before the older mature boars come for dinner. Most hunters shoot the first legal bear they see resulting in younger bears being taken. If you want a big bear you have to learn to wait.

  5. jes on March 17th, 2010 9:03 am

    Same applies to the bigger turkeys, and deer….The smarter ones wait and let the younger, more stupid ones go in and check it out, before they consider it safe…(I’ve got many a trophy by just watching the first ones come in and check it out)

  6. Jim Richards on March 17th, 2010 9:23 am

    Jes,
    How true, you have to let those jakes go on by to get that old strutting bird.

  7. Adventures in Togo: Some Background on Togo and the Peace Corps | Educational West Virginia on March 17th, 2010 10:30 am

    [...] Comparing Wisconsin's And Michigan's Bear Management Programs … [...]

  8. Mass Media Content » Calif. California Recovery Task Force … | Educational Maryland on March 17th, 2010 10:35 am

    [...] Comparing Wisconsin's And Michigan's Bear Management Programs … [...]

Got something to say?






Bottom