Stepping Up To Help Maine’s Deer Herd Could Get Bogged Down In Politics
December 28, 2009
I recently posted the thoughts and ideas of George Smith, Executive Director of the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, in his quest to save and/or rebuild a large portion of Maine’s whitetail deer population that is dismal and described as some as beyond rebuilding.
While the debate on that subject is young and in need of “help” from “everyone”, I thought as one of every I would offer up my own thoughts in response to Smith’s.
There’s a big rub that exists when talking about the deer herd in Maine. That rub is the dissatisfaction of the Maine hunter who buys the license. Hunters want action not another effort of gathering together stakeholders to rehash what most already know. They don’t see any of the previous efforts put forth as amounting to anything. Why would it be different now?
Can we blame the disgruntled hunters for feeling this way? The deer are gone and what the hunters are getting is more blaming of bad winters and cut down forests. They are tired of hearing about these excuses and they want action. Calling together all the same components of what to hunters looks like failed policies and poor management, isn’t going over big at all. That’s a wall that needs dismantling.
Smith says early on in his piece that a process has to be followed or the consequences could be more harmful than helpful.
Effective action follows understanding follows fact finding.
I wonder if the “facts” will come mostly from the same source of “facts” that has gotten us to the point we are in now? The most important fact is that the deer herd in depleted in certain areas of the state. A fact is what has taken place, whether natural or man made hasn’t worked. A fact is maybe it’s time to find some “different” facts.
I’m not suggesting anyone is insane, but the definition of such is a repetition of the same action hoping for a different result. Sanity tells us if the repetition isn’t working, perhaps we need to change something. We cannot pretend to gain an understanding of facts we aren’t convinced accurately describe a situation.
If we are to effect the proper action to achieve an end result, there must be a united effort as Smith suggests. The only way that is going to happen is to convince the disgruntled hunters.
So where are the facts to effect this understanding and action going to come from? The Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife? Try telling these angry hunters that MDIFW has the facts. Why should they be believed? Hunters have laid out a lot of money over the years and the results are not very good.
Are we going to believe “facts” from the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine? Some will. Many won’t. Sportsmen are not united on issues and while the SAM is the largest organization representing Maine sportsmen, it doesn’t represent a majority of hunters.
Will “facts” come from guides and outfitters? That’s tough as well. You see we find out that the Maine guides seemed to dictate to MDIFW that they didn’t want more bear harvested as a means of helping to reduce bear predation on deer. It was reported in a previous article on Smith’s blog that MDIFW was simply following the recommendations of the predator working group. It doesn’t sit well with deer hunters when they find a group getting their wishes taken care of at what appears to be the expense of the deer population.
The stakeholders in the issue are everybody who buys a hunting license to hunt deer. Let’s not kid ourselves. The groups are simply a means of gathering more power to promote group agendas, therefore having more influence on game management policies of the MDIFW. I suppose one can either work independently, join an existing group that seems to best represent their ideals or shut up and go away.
Everyone of the groups I’ve mentioned and not mentioned, including the individual deer hunter, plays an important and integral role in deer management in Maine. The squeaky wheel gets the grease and the squeakiest wheel isn’t necessarily a good representation of the hunting population.
Smith’s contention that “Effective action follows understanding follows fact finding” is a good one but each element of that progression has to be done right. The task that lies ahead to gather facts that can be agreed upon by an overwhelming majority of hunters and not just by the “group in charge” is the axis that will make the wheel turn. Once that is achieved, gaining understanding and putting together actions shouldn’t be so difficult.
I believe Smith understands this.
We cannot sugar-coat this situation. Hunters deserve to know the truth. What is the situation? What can we expect in 2010 and the years beyond? What will work? What won’t work? Who is stepping up to help? Who is not? These truths must come from every organization, including landowner groups, SAM, and DIF&W. And we better be together on this. There is simply no room for argument, or a shading of the facts to suit someone’s agenda. SAM seeks a commitment from all major players to both fact finding and truth telling. I am promising you will get nothing but the unvarnished truth from SAM, even if some of it is hard to accept.
My fear is that the “facts” will be repeated from the same sources as before without support and explanation from someone hunters can trust. I don’t know who that is but it might be worthwhile to come up with one, two or three people who can hammer out the “facts” and pass them on to hunters in order to bring them on board.
Smith says, “And we better be together on this”. He’s right but how do we do that? If we can figure that out, the rest should be comparatively easy.
If you hunt and you care about the future of deer hunting in Maine, I would suggest getting involved. How you do that is up to you. I suggested before that perhaps you can find a sportsman’s organization that best fits your ideals. Bear in mind you won’t find a perfect one, just a good one.
You can also become an activists by yourself. Talk to your friends and neighbors about what’s going on with the deer. Help them understand why it is important to everyone that we have a healthy deer herd, a well-managed one that includes predator controls, etc. Do some research on your own seeking the truth about deer management, predator management and landowner rights. Talk to your local game warden. If you can develop a good report with them, they can educated you to a lot of what is going on in your area. Report a poacher.
Do your part as a hunter. If there are too many coyotes in your favorite hunting spot, take up hunting them or find someone who will. Invite a trapper or a coyote hunter to come on your land and do some of your own predator control.
This task will not be easy but sitting idly by complaining isn’t a viable option.
In the future I will examine more of Smith’s ideas as well as those of others and the progress that is being made. Look for updates and links.
More responses: Fact Finding
Tom Remington
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
We feature the latest news, events and politics effecting the sports of hunting, fishing, and all outdoor activities in North America.
Tom, as usual, you are the best source of useful material on outdoor issues in Maine. FIRSTest with the MOSTest. Please keep it up.
Hunters have to do their part but SAM has got to get IF&W to publish informative and useful information on how we get our deer herd back. Give them a spine. Without deer hunters the state’s outdoor industry will go broke and IF&W with it.
The Napolitano response to the Christmas Day failed Pants Bomber has a parallel here:
…..Napolitano said that the system worked because some individual took matters into his own hands.
…..Now that we have lost a very large number of our deer up north the biologists responsible for the state’s hunting economy now say that hunters need to do what the biologists failed to do – they need to take matters into their own hands.
The IF&W response for the past decades that there is nothing that can be done about the coyote and it isn’t much of a problem anyway. So…hunters have to take care of the Coyote because IF&W is at the mercy of the anti-hunting lot. It is hard to tell the difference in the public stance of IF&W and the anti’s regarding deer management and predator control in Maine.
I suspect the basic plan will be to stall and hope that a string of several moderate winters will allow the deer population to come back up north. It will be successful anyway because several years will have gone by and hunters will lose faith and stop hunting up north. Now to stop the wood harvesting….
The express highway to the Northwoods National Park? I suspect so. Humbug!!!
Well said, Richard! More on Smith’s “Finding Facts” ideas will be posted soon.
I agree with your analogy of “the system worked”. I discussed with one “Mainer” about this issue and he said he would put his faith in what IFW wants to do. And of course you know my response – “How’s that working out?”
If Maine opts to go the route of merging IFW into a larger natural resources department, you can only expect the love fest between IFW and anti-hunters to grow. It will become like most all the rest, just a giant environmental club of rights stealers.
I do not feel there is any reason to get the state involved in anything. I feel it is the same old story….” Someone needs to do something” let me be the fist to tell you that The “SOMEONE” is going to be you. I did not get a buck this year either. Was the reason due to lack of deer? Was the reason to many coyote`s? I could put the blame on that if I wanted to put blame on some thing other then myself. Truth of the matter is I was not good enough to get the big buck. I saw the sign and I saw the tracks, not alot of it, but enough to keep me in the game. Last year I sat some place in what I thought was a good place to sit. I shot a nice 6 pointer that went 185#. So I sat there this season expecting the same results. The few deer that there is, was coming in at night . After sulking for the remainder of rifle season, I was glad it snowed for the Muzzle loader season. I did ended up tracking some, and found out where some deer where living, lucky for them I did not have a any deer permit, for I did track down a huge doe and her fawn. ( yes I need more practice SEXING TRACKS) I spotted them not 30 yards in they`re beds. Yes, Buckless but not hopeless. If you want to improve your hunting area take up hunting them dam dogs, and take up trapping the YOTES!! I do feel that there is not just one reason the deer numbers are down. I feel it is ALL THE REASONS!!! The one thing we can control is the coyote! I am willing to learn, are you????
[...] Link to related article. [...]
[...] Please find the entire email of Smith’s at this link. I will also attempt to provide all the links to all the articles pertaining to this debate at each of the sites where posted. Yesterday’s response can be found here. [...]
[...] Link to related story. [...]
[...] Please find the entire email of Smith’s at this link. I will also attempt to provide all the links to all the articles pertaining to this debate at each of the sites where posted. Yesterday’s response can be found here. [...]