Wolves: When Ignorance Is Bliss : Black Bear Blog
Top

Wolves: When Ignorance Is Bliss

September 1, 2009


Editor’s note: The following article is being reprinted with permission from the author, Dr. Valerius Geist and The Bugle, a publication of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

Wolves: When Ignorance Is Bliss

Wolves mustn’t be coddled if we hope to balance them with modern ecosystems—and to avoid becoming prey.

By Dr. Valerius Geist

Nothing convinces like personal experience! And I too am slave to it. As an academic I confess to this with some distress, because by training, experience and attitude I should be above it. That I am not alone in this habit is of little comfort. And so it was with wolves.

In my field research on mountain sheep, goats, moose etc. I also observed wolves, and my experience with North American wolves matches that of colleagues. Consequently, during my academic career and four years into retirement I thought of wolves as harmless, echoing the words of more experienced colleagues while considering the reports to the contrary from Russia as interesting, but not relevant to an understanding of North American wolves. I trusted my wolf-studying colleagues to have done their homework and I dismissed light-heartedly the experiences of others to the contrary. I was wrong!

I saw my first wolf in the wild early one morning in May 1959, on Pyramid Mountain in Wells Gray Provincial Park, British Columbia. I spotted an ash-gray wolf, with a motley coat, sitting and watching me from a quarter mile away with an eager, attentive look about his dark face. His red tongue was protruding, while golden morning light played on his fur. In the spotting scope his image was crisp and clear. I do not know if my heart skipped a beat, but it well might have. Whose wouldn’t?

Five months prior, in early January, I had had an informative brush with a wolf pack just a few miles from that spot. A friend and I were observing moose. We were in the midst of a migration and some two dozen, mostly bulls who had shed antlers, were dispersed over a huge burn. A few were feeding on the tall willows, but most were resting in the knee-deep snow. Suddenly we heard a low, drawn-out moan. When I glanced at the moose I saw that all were standing alert, facing down the valley. We were green then and perplexed about this unearthly sound.

As if to answer us, a high-pitched voice broke in, and then another and another. We realized we were hearing wolves. Within minutes a chorus was underway—and so were the moose. All were hastily moving up the valley and 10 minutes later the moose had vanished. I opted to stay at our lookout while my friend borrowed my rifle and went to search for the wolves. He saw them at dusk as they walked across a small lake, a pack of seven. Try as he may, the rifle would not fire; it had frozen in the great cold. This may have been kind fortune, for the first wolf I shot with that rifle instantly attacked me, but collapsed before reaching me. The second screamed, and that has triggered pack attacks in the past. Had the pack attacked, I would have been minus a friend in minutes. While a large man can subdue an attacking wolf, even strangle it, there is no defense against an attacking pack.

Two years later during my study of Stone’s sheep in northern British Columbia, I had exceptional opportunities to observe wolves in pristine wilderness. My closest neighbors, a trapper family, lived some 40 miles to the west, and the closest settlement of Telegraph Creek was about 80 miles to the north. Timberlines were low, and the wolves spent much time in the open, plainly visible. I watched them for hours on end. These were large, painfully shy wolves that on occasion even panicked over my scent. Though they killed a few sheep, their hunts were largely unsuccessful. However, I began to appreciate their strategies and tenacity as hunters. In traversing the valley I crossed a wolf track about every 50 paces. They were that thorough in scouring the valley for moose.

On rare occasions a wolf would follow my tracks and sit and listen to what I was doing in my cabin at night. (Grizzly bears did that, too.) One evening three wolves began to surround me on a frozen lake. One raced towards me, but scrambled madly to get away once he got downwind of me. Another cut my fresh track, then jumped straight up and raced back. Thus my early experiences with mainland wolves indicated they were shy and cautious. Moreover, they were few compared to the huge number of Osborn’s caribou. I then thought that this was normal. Years later a first doubt arose when a student of mine could hardly find a caribou where I had seen hundreds, and a wolf pack of 43 individuals was recorded where I had observed for years a pack of seven.

Evidently, my experiences with wolves were anomalous, for a decade earlier there had been massive broadcast poisonings of wolves to control rabies. The “pristine wilderness” had been tampered with; I had experienced a “rebound” of ungulate populations after they had been freed from severe predation. When my wife and I tell of forests of antlers as caribou bulls gathered on the Spazisi Plateau for the rut, colleagues look at us as if we came from another age. Maybe we do.

Nothing in my previous studies had prepared me for what I was to experience with wolves on Vancouver Island beginning in 1999. In my student days, in the late 1950s, wolves on Vancouver Island were so scarce that some thought they were extinct. In the early 1970s they reappeared and swept the island. The annual hunter-harvest of black-tailed deer dropped swiftly from about 25,000 to less than 3,000 today. There were incidents of wolves threatening people, and a colleague, treed by a pack, clammed up as nobody believed it. Wolves threatening people? Ridiculous!

According to my colleagues, massive clear-cutting of old-growth forests and the rapid spread and growth of the wolf population caused the carnage. Those who witnessed it tell of deer carcasses everywhere—and then no more deer. The loggers left standing small patches of mature timber as deer winter range. However, wolves, cougars and black bears discovered those patches and cleared out the remaining deer. The clearcuts also led to a population explosion of black bears; some became experts in killing elk calves and deer fawns. Deer are still so few and far between in the mountains that I see about three dozen bears for every deer. However, deer are common in towns, suburbs and about farms, where they are somewhat safe, at least from wolves. The elk population is holding its own, but at a low level compared to the vast amounts of food on the clearcuts. The bulls are huge, with massive antlers, but with a predator-induced silence during the rut. Enough calves perish so that there is little recruitment and we hunters are held to one permit per 40-150 applicants.

I retired to an agricultural area on Vancouver Island in 1995. During walks near our home I explored at all seasons a meadow system associated with dairy, beef and sheep farming. These meadows and adjacent forests contained, year-round, about 120 black-tailed deer and half a dozen large male black bears. In winter came some 60-80 trumpeter swans, as well as large flocks of Canada geese, widgeons, mallards and green-winged teals. Pheasants and ruffed grouse were not uncommon. In the fall of 1995 I saw one track of a lone wolf. I cannot recall seeing any wolf tracks in the four years following. Then in January 1999 my oldest son Karl and I tracked a pair of wolves in the snow, suggesting a breeding pair and thus pack-formation. A pack did indeed arrive that summer. Within three months not a deer was to be seen, or tracked, in these meadows—even during the rut. Using powerful lights we saw deer at night huddling against barns and houses where deer had not been seen previously. For the first time deer moved into our garden and around our house, and the damage to our fruit trees and roses skyrocketed. The trumpeter swans left not to return for four years, until the last of the pack was killed. The geese and ducks avoided the outer meadows and lived only close to the barns. Pheasants and ruffed grouse vanished. The landscape looked empty, as if vacuumed of wildlife.

Wolves attacked and killed or injured dogs, at times right beside their shouting, gesticulating owners. Wolves began following our neighbors when they rode out on horseback. A duck hunter shot one wolf and fatally wounded another as three attacked his dog. They ventured into gardens and under verandas trying to get at dogs, and ran after quads, tractors and motorcycles to attack the accompanying farm dogs. My neighbor warded off three such attacks on his dogs with his boots, and his hired man ran back to a tractor in panic after the wolves chased two dogs under it. One wolf approached within about 15 paces of my wife and a group of eleven visitors that were taking an evening stroll about half a mile from our house. The wolf howled and barked at the people. Our neighbor then went out armed with his dogs, and the wolf, a small female, promptly attacked the dogs and was shot at 50 feet. Nine days later my neighbor killed a second wolf that was following and barking at him. This wolf may have been defending a sheep it had dragged half a mile. These weighed between 60 and 70 lbs, small for wolves, a sign of poor nutrition.

A neighbor raising sheep lost many to wolves, so he acquired five large, sheep-guarding dogs. These dogs and the wolf pack had frequent, night-long barking and howling duels at the forest edge. I observed subsequently, on the evening of October 19th 2002, how the last of the pack, a male, fraternize successfully with the sheep dogs. He kept it up and was eventually shot March 12th 2003 while sitting among these dogs. However, before that he visited us when our female German longhair pointer, Susu, was in heat, and barked at my wife in our doorway. That is, he acted like other male dogs that were attracted to Susu in heat, only bolder.

Wolves had been seen in the neighborhood sitting and observing people; we know from captivity studies that wolves are observation learners. One male approached my wife, my brother-in-law and myself across a quarter-mile of open meadow and stood looking us over for a very long minute about 10 paces away before moving on into the forest. Along with my neighbors, I repeatedly saw wolves showing interest in humans.

However, the worst incident happened about 350 yards from our house when the second misbehaving pack formed. On March 27th, 2007, our neighbors went in the morning to inspect their dairy cattle and pastures. Their old dog ran ahead of them. Just as they entered the forest five wolves attacked the dog. My neighbor grabbed a cedar branch and advanced on the wolves, which turned towards him snarling. His wife jumped into the caboose of their excavator that happened to be nearby. My neighbor’s energetic counter attack freed the dog, and intimidated all but one wolf that advanced on him snarling. However, he too withdrew, even if reluctantly. While my neighbor ran home to get a gun, his wife ran to us, shouting for me to get a rifle. We did not see the wolves, though they were sighted briefly in the evening, and a neighbor walking his dog had an encounter with two wolves about a mile away. He was able to chase them away. The following morning our neighbors took a rifle along during their inspection trip of their property. The wolf pack promptly went for them again and my neighbor shot the most aggressive one, a male weighing 74 lbs. I saw the neighbors’ cattle, spooked by a wolf, crash through fences while fleeing for the security of their barn. I found two of the three cattle killed and eaten by wolves; the third was severely injured about the genitals, udder and haunches and had to be put down. I saw the docked tails, slit ears and wounded hocks on the dairy cows. Our neighbor’s hired man saw from a barn a wolf attacking a heifer with a newborn calf. He raced out and put the calf on his quad. As he ran to the barn the wolf ran alongside, lunging at the calf – and right into the barn! A predator control officer was called and 13 wolves were removed within a mile of our house from the first, and four from the second misbehaving pack.

That “tameness,” that “hanging around,” that increasing boldness and inquisitiveness, is the wolf’s way of exploring its potential prey, and the strength of its potential enemies. Coyotes targeting children in urban parks act in virtually the same manner. Two wolves in June 2000 severely injured a camper on Vargas Island just off the coast of Vancouver Island. These wolves became even tamer before the attack, as they nipped at the clothing of campers, licked their exposed skin and ate hotdogs from their hands. Our observations here suggested that wolves, attracted to habitations by the scarcity of prey, shift to dogs and livestock, but also increasingly, though cautiously, explore humans, before mounting a first, clumsy attack.

I reported such at a Wildlife Society conference on Sept. 27th 2005 in Madison, Wisconsin, in an invited paper on habituation of wildlife. That was about six weeks before wolves killed Kenton Carnegie on November 8th in northern Saskatchewan. I subsequently became involved along with Marc McNay from Alaska and Brent Patterson from Ontario, investigating this incident for Kenton’s parents. Also, a book manuscript on wolves in Russia came across my desk, written by an American linguist stationed in Moscow, Will Graves. It had integrity, and I proposed to edit it and find a publisher. Detselig in Calgary published Wolves in Russia: Anxiety through the Ages, in April 2007. We included into Will’s book as appendix A the English translation of Mikhail P. Pavlov’s chapter 12 of The Wolf in Game Management. This work had caused howls of outrage by environmentalists when translated into Norwegian.

Then a review of the Russian wolf experiences by Professor Christian Stubbe in Germany vindicated Will Graves’ writing. In the meantime Italian and French historians published papers and books detailing how thousands of people had died in earlier centuries from wolf attacks. Some historians rightly asked the question, how did North American scientists ever conclude that wolves were harmless and no threat to people? We now know the answer: In the absence of personal experience or sound language competence, they chose to disregard, even ridicule, the accumulated experience of others from Russia, France, Italy, Germany, Finland, Greenland, Sweden, Iran, Kazakhstan, India, Afghanistan, Korea, and Japan.

Is it not time we paid attention in order to discover how to manage wolves so as to have both, security and abundant wildlife?

The absolutely precious lesson from our North American experience with wolves in the 20th century is that at low wolf-to-prey ratios wolves grow into very large, shy specimens that shun humans, while greatly enriching our landscape and quality of life. Control will be seen as essential to maintain wolves and robust big game populations and minimize intrusions by wolves into human settlements.

There is a French saying that he who desires a beautiful park must have a very sharp ax, and a heart of stone. We should heed it—for the sake of elk, elk hunters, the wolves themselves, and for the future of wildlife conservation in North America.

Widely renowned authority on the world’s deer, Valerius Geist is professor emeritus of environmental science at the University of Calgary, an award winning author and, among others, a recipient of the Elk Foundation’s Olaus Murie Award in 2003.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Related Articles

Comments

13 Responses to “Wolves: When Ignorance Is Bliss”

  1. Dave Brocklebank on September 1st, 2009 11:15 pm

    You talk of severe number drops of caribou because a wolf population rebound in the Spatzizi
    I witnessessed at Gnat Pass, from the highway, in 2004, a herd of caribou come into view over the crest of the distant mountain, what could be described through eyes, defined as to what it was through binoculars, as a swarm of locusts.
    Big bull caribou and all the rest of the herd, swinging from one direction to the other before they settled on the west slopes about 2 to 3 kilometers from where they broke over the ridge.
    My father-in-law, a Tahltan elder had suggested we stop there for lunch on our wat back to telegraph Creek from a weekend of blueberry picking at Burrarge as it should be qany time now they’ll be coming.
    Sure enough – they appeared – me without a video camera – on schedule.
    Leave mother nature to deal with the supply and demand.
    I have witnessed many wolves in my 24 years in Telegraph Creek, some evn coming into town searching in extreme conditions, but they hqave ne3ver presented a problem. Everything balances it’s self out in nature – it gets screwed up when man interferes.

  2. Jim Richards on September 2nd, 2009 4:18 pm

    I agree man screwed up when they reintroduced wolves to Yellowstone in 94.

  3. jes on September 2nd, 2009 5:14 pm

    Yeah, Dave, man really screws it up….sometimes….And given the freedom to eat their fill of caribou, as they were in olden times eating their fill of buffalo, in this country, there would be no problem with letting nature take it’s course…For harsh winters, and migrating lifestyles will even the score..

    But we are not talking about the workings of nature in a sheep pen, for that is practically what we have with the game and wolves in national parks, and something akin to suburbia where man has settled, even in the remote parts of our country…At least when it comes down to the ancient lifestyles of the herds of elk, buffalo and the like.. Man has already “interfered”…..and it is up to him to keep it in order…

    And what difference does it make when the wolves have decimated the herds? For if man is not there to judge or be effected…And as the game is eaten, the wolves starve, and the procession begins again…once again, less wolves, once again, more game….But where man lives, he creates his own “balance”, and his concern creates the problems or the answers…

  4. Blissful Ignorance Is Dangerous To Your Health : Black Bear Blog on September 28th, 2009 10:15 am

    [...] that appeared in The Bugle, a publication of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. The article, “Wolves: When Ignorance is Bliss” by Dr. Valerius Geist, helped us to better understand that we don’t understand. We are [...]

  5. Blissful Ignorance Is Dangerous To Your Health : Conservative Zone on September 28th, 2009 11:39 am

    [...] that appeared in The Bugle, a publication of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation. The article, “Wolves: When Ignorance is Bliss” by Dr. Valerius Geist, helped us to better understand that we don’t understand. We are [...]

  6. John Holmgren on November 10th, 2009 10:50 pm

    Valerius Geist?? A world renowned authority? His tale speaks for itself–talk about bad science! I rarely get a chance to waste my time reading such tripe. The big bad wolf strikes again–a few people buy into it and perpetuate the myths.

  7. Mikel on November 11th, 2009 1:27 am

    John,
    Do you live with wolves?

  8. jes on November 11th, 2009 7:46 am

    No, he doesn’t live with wolves….he lives with his Disneyland version of what he thinks the world should be like (for wolves)….and expects you to live with it.
    I’d like to see his weaselly ass out with a hungry pack, and watch his version of “myths” flash before his eyes…

  9. Greg Farber on November 11th, 2009 11:30 am

    To funny, Canada and Russia, as well Italy and other European countries, Have a couple centuries of experience with wolves, Satanic Disney (Walt Disney was a porno freak) land has 15 years.. Val Geist predicted these American mistakes would be made in the 1970s.. ha ha, the tripe is this American science which is infiltrated with lies stacked up on top of other lies.. The worship of the communist godless dog (SIRIUS) is fascinating to watch.. Oh well, it’ll all crash soon and these wimps will starve to death..I hope they enjoy chewing on advanced degree stupidity..

  10. Greg Farber on November 11th, 2009 1:31 pm

    Big bad wolves have a history to.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_attacks_on_humans

  11. Keith Lunders on January 29th, 2010 1:19 pm

    As a 33 year pre and post wolf resident of a tiny north central Idaho town (Elk River), I can tell city-dwelling readers that the impact of wolves on our game populations has been catastrophic. Having destroyed what was once the largest elk herd in the US they are now moving in around every town/city in the region (where the remaining game is concentrated) and attacks on domestic pets are becoming much more frequent. Cattlemen have their own long list of horror stories of wolf predation on their stock, most of which they are never compensated for. Perhaps when wolves start carrying off the Cadillacs and swimming pools of city residents they’ll identify with their rural brethren, the ones who produce the food they eat.
    I could write a book of hair-raising wolf encounters I’ve heard from local hunters but so far as I know there’ve been no actual attacks on humans. Given the scarcity of native wildlife it’s just a matter of time before we read or experience such an event. What has been documented is that wolves have been observed scoping out humans, as in schoolchildren waiting for their bus. Wolves have changed completely the rural lifestyle synonymous with the west.
    Probably even more devastating to the human population of the Pacific Northwest is the idiotic contamination of an entire ecosystem with a heretofor unknown and deadly parasite (hydatid disease) spread primarily by wolves. Now that it’s established it will be here forever, being carried and spread by ungulates, carnivores, pets, etc. Depending on where it takes up residence in a human it can be more than an inconvenience, the end result being an autopsy.
    One can only imagine the righteous indignation and outrage that would rise like a mushroom cloud over the population centers of this country if massive numbers of plague-carrying rats were dumped in them. And rats wouldn’t be the equivalent of what’s been dumped into Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho, and is spreading fast into adjacent states as undisturbed wolves expand their territory. It would be poetic justice if they made their way to Seattle, San Fransisco, Sacramento, Los Angeles, etc., all areas where they once roamed freely too. Would do wonders for their homeless problem.

  12. Harley on March 4th, 2010 9:09 pm

    Ok, I have a question. If wolves are these eating machines, why did they not wipe out the moose on Isle Royale? The one thing that did cut down, drastically, on the moose population was a nasty infestation of ticks. Cut the moose population in half. It had nothing to do with the wolves. I don’t know if it’s just… those wolves on Isle Royale, maybe smaller than the ones you all are talking about wiping out the elk herds and such? I don’t know, this is an honest question, not a challenge to your information. i’m just curious.

  13. Harley on March 4th, 2010 11:15 pm

    I’m realizing I’m about 2 months behind on the particular subject. Not sure if I should repost this elsewhere…

Got something to say?






Bottom