Is Obama Blatantly Manipulating The Courts With His Selection Of Sotomayor?
May 29, 2009
It would be naive to think that no president ever considered his appointments to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court as a way to help protect or promote his ideals. How far is a president willing to go to intentionally attempt to manipulate the system in order to achieve personal agendas?
When Senator Barack Hussein Obama was a candidate for president of the United States, I spent a great deal of time writing about his history when it comes to Second Amendment issues. This also included multiple articles on the most prominent Second Amendment case the Supreme Court ruled on in recent history – District of Columbia vs. Heller.
Over seven months ago I brought you a story that got very little attention and few people know about even today. Perhaps it is time to revive that story a bit.
From 1994-2002 Obama was director of an organization called the Joyce Foundation. It’s aim was the destruction of the Second Amendment. This foundation, led by Barack Obama, tried to manipulated the courts, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court by stuffing the law review libraries in several prominent law schools.
At the Supreme Court level, we know there are very few prior cases that deal with the Second Amendment. After all, it took well over 200 years before the court would finally make a ruling on whether the Second Amendment actually did guarantee individual citizens the right to keep and bear arms. (District of Columbia vs. Heller)
It is known that all stewards of the law have to rely on past cases in presenting an argument as do judges in rendering decisions. If there is no actual case history, often lawyers and judges will refer to articles written at law school review libraries. These articles carry some weight because they are accepted and approved before being published.
It was Obama’s contention and that of the Joyce Foundation that if they stuffed enough anti-Second Amendment law review articles into college libraries, this would help sway the courts to render decisions against the Second Amendment. Class act wouldn’t you say.
As they say, there’s more than one way to skin a cat. We now wonder how Obama will achieve what many of us already know – his desire to rid the country of guns and destroy the Second Amendment.
We know since becoming president he has tried to reduce the availability of ammunition. He was unsuccessful in ordering all military spent brass, used by companies to reload and resell, destroyed and rendered useless.
We also know that when Obama traveled to Mexico recently, he told leaders he would encourage his Congress to ratify CIFTA – a global treaty former assault-weapons-banner-in-chief, Bill Clinton, tried to get passed. This treaty would submit U.S. citizens under the power of a U.N. entity that would take away our guns.
We can feel quite confident that Obama will find any means necessary to take our guns. (laugh if you want to). He is not afraid of slimy court manipulations and fraud to influence the courts nor is he shy about bringing in outside gangs to help him with his agenda.
So, with all this said, can we begin to think that just maybe Obama is using an anti-gun Sonia Sotomayor as another game piece to achieve his ends? For those who care enough to learn, we have come to realize that Sotomayer is about as anti-Second Amendment as they come. Consider this.
Six months after Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in upholding the belief that the Second Amendment was a guaranteed individual right, given to us by God and not allowed by the Constitution, Federal Appeals Court judge Sonia Sotomayor completely disregarded District of Columbia vs Heller.
In Maloney vs. Cuomo, she ruled that the Second Amendment had nothing to do with individual rights nor did the federal government have any say in the matter. She claimed the states had the right to make any gun banning laws they wanted regardless of what the Second Amendment said (my words not hers).
Of course I have no idea where gun banning sits on Obama’s priority list. Does anyone? But we know it is there. He stated clearly that he wanted an “empathetic” justice who could rule by having a better understanding of the way things are in our country today, and it appears he found one of those. If gun banning is second, third or lower on Obama’s wish list of rights to take away in order to achieve his fascists regime, picking Sotomayor may have been just another bonus feather in his cap – kind of a two or more for the price of one.
Obama is a big enough narcissist that he believes, like back in the Joyce Foundation days, he can manipulate even the United States Supreme Court in order to fulfill his fascist agenda.
Tom Remington
Related Articles
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
We feature the latest news, events and politics effecting the sports of hunting, fishing, and all outdoor activities in North America.
In fairness, we should consider the arguments against the judge.
Once these empathetic communists get the guns from us they can shove their NWO down our throats and fleece us of the little we have left…These thugs are so greedy they want to own the planet and all living beings on it..and they wish to have the power of life or death over us all…like their gods..And lets be clear, they think they are gods..
OH NO, of course not. The illegal president wouldn’t do that. He wouldn’t
harm anyone giving up their guns – willingly or otherwise. He wouldn’t give away money to criminals ,either. Nor would the illegal president prosecute any of the criminals. And he wouldn’t keep extreme terrorists in jail. What a guy.
Illegal President ?? Are you kidding me? He really is a great guy ar, come on man ! ha ha ha ha ha ha ha….OH NO….I think your right dude…
IF THE GRAND JURY IS GOOD ENOUGH AND TRUSTWORTHY ENOUGH FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO IMPRISON OR KILL WE THE
PEOPLE THEN THE GRAND JURY SYSTEM IS ALSO GOOD ENOUGH AND TRUSTWORTHY ENOUGH TO INVESTIGATE THE GOVERNMENT FOR CRIMES
On his first day in office, January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009.
What this executive order says is that only the Attorney General (Eric Holder) and Council to the President (Gregory Craig) are able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made public or not.
In other words, you aren’t going to see any records or documents that Obama doesn’t want you to see.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that Obama’s first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints—none! There is no Obama documentation—no bona fides—no paper trail—nothing. It can be stated with authority that Obama has not provided enough information to obtain a drivers license, yet he sits in the White House as the defacto commander-in-chief of the U.S. armed forces and with the highest possible national security clearance.
Following is a list of what should be public records that Obama has refused to voluntarily release publicly:
Original, vault copy birth certificate; Certificate of Live Birth (released but proven counterfeit); Obama/Dunham marriage license; Obama/Dunham divorce (released upon discovery by independent investigators); Soetoro/Dunham marriage license; Soetoro adoption records; Soetoro/Dunham divorce (released upon discovery by independent investigators); Fransiskus Assisi School school application (released upon discovery by independent investigators); Punahou School records; Selective Service Registration (released but counterfeit); Occidental College records; Passport (records scrubbed clean by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser); Columbia College records; Columbia thesis; Harvard College records; Harvard Law Review articles (none); Baptism certificate (none); Medical records; Illinois State Senate records (none); Illinois State Senate schedule —Lost Law practice client list—Not released; University of Chicago scholarly articles (none).
A U.S. president is arguably the most public man in America yet all that we know about Obama is what he tells us and what information is uncovered or his people allow into the public arena. Thus far, all attempts to force public disclosure of Obama’s public records—several of which have gone all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court—have been blocked and the corporate media (both “liberal” and “conservative”) are conspicuously silent about the fact that there is no proof that Obama is who he claims to be.
Reviving the citizen grand jury to indict a “president”
Leo Donofrio is one of the men who challenged Obama’s qualifications as president-elect all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and was denied.
He has since determined that the only remaining mechanism available to the American people is to revive the citizen grand jury which, by its very nature, functions independently of government prosecutors and judges and was originally used by the people to indict corrupt government actors. The process has since been coopted by the government to obtain indictments against the people—and it works almost every time.
Per the 10th Amendment, citizens can form grand juries with or without the consent of any branch of state or federal government. Furthermore, any and all rules imposed to limit the formation and/or operation of grand juries are void as unconstitutional.
Per the 11th Amendment, citizens can form federal or state grand juries without interference by the federal government.
Once convened, Donofrio argues, citizen grand juries can subpoena any and all of Obama’s “personal records held in any state or federal government office or department and said office or department is compelled by the Constitution, to produce said records for said Grand Juries.”
Donofrio is in the process of convening a citizens’ grand jury in Henry County, GA, and plans to issue subpoenas to the entities that hold the records that have not been released (see above). “Of course Obama will challenge it. My advisors say don’t worry because then it goes straight to the U.S. Supreme Court upon original jurisdiction and the patriots will win,” Donofrio said and added, “No questions about standing, no sanctions, no dismissals—straight win in the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Donofrio is urging Americans to research the citizen grand jury process and revive it in their own communities. His website at http://www.riseupforamerica.com is posting all the information necessary to understand the purpose of citizen grand juries and the process of forming them. The website is also continually updating Donofrio’s progress.
“Remember Patriots, the case against Barack Hussein Obama will be over in discovery, therefore, let us commence with our discovery of the truth regarding the suspect commonly known to us citizens as Barack Hussein Obama of unknown citizenship, allegiance and alliances,” Donofrio said.
Leo Donofrio is one of the men who challenged Obama’s qualifications as president-elect all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and was denied.
He has since determined that the only remaining mechanism available to the American people is to revive the citizen grand jury which, by its very nature, functions independently of government prosecutors and judges and was originally used by the people to indict corrupt government actors. The process has since been coopted by the government to obtain indictments against the people—and it works almost every time.
Per the 10th Amendment, citizens can form grand juries with or without the consent of any branch of state or federal government. Furthermore, any and all rules imposed to limit the formation and/or operation of grand juries are void as unconstitutional.
Per the 11th Amendment, citizens can form federal or state grand juries without interference by the federal government.
Once convened, Donofrio argues, citizen grand juries can subpoena any and all of Obama’s “personal records held in any state or federal government office or department and said office or department is compelled by the Constitution, to produce said records for said Grand Juries.”
Donofrio is in the process of convening a citizens’ grand jury in Henry County, GA, and plans to issue subpoenas to the entities that hold the records that have not been released (see above). “Of course Obama will challenge it. My advisors say don’t worry because then it goes straight to the U.S. Supreme Court upon original jurisdiction and the patriots will win,” Donofrio said and added, “No questions about standing, no sanctions, no dismissals—straight win in the U.S. Supreme Court.”
Donofrio is urging Americans to research the citizen grand jury process and revive it in their own communities. His website at http://www.riseupforamerica.com is posting all the information necessary to understand the purpose of citizen grand juries and the process of forming them. The website is also continually updating Donofrio’s progress.
“Remember Patriots, the case against Barack Hussein Obama will be over in discovery, therefore, let us commence with our discovery of the truth regarding the suspect commonly known to us citizens as Barack Hussein Obama of unknown citizenship, allegiance and alliances,” Donofrio said.
http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20090501.htm
My grandad always said the best way to take the u.s. down was from the inside. Looking more and more like he might be right. Obama’s off to a pretty good start already. Makes me sick seeing all the crap the going on, can’t believe they call themselves americans.
Greg, great stuff.
This country has been being taken down officially since 1868 14th Amendment Massacre of Liberty…But the war known as the Revolution never ended and truthfully was only a battle..European elements infiltrated our Congress even then, as the five year fight over the Bill of Rights shows..from 1787-1792 and before it was settled those numskulls in Congress were threatened with more warfare..BY US…Then every conflict since then has been a Vatican fomented debacle to break the back of our LIBERTY which they hate… War of 1812, War with Mexico over Texas, which was intended to escalate deep into the US and create Civil chaos, failed…Civil War…and finally this 150 years war of attrition via information…A mixing war if you will…Their taking us down with out firing a shot…