Senate Votes For Polar Bear To Control Economic Growth
March 9, 2009
When you read a headline like that, you have to say, “What the heck does that mean?” I’ll tell you what it might mean and then you can decide for yourself.
Remember when the Bush administration, including Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, last year decided, in what I perceived as an ignorant move, to place the polar bear as a “threatened” species under the Endangered Species Act? In so doing, the government essentially agreed with the environmental extremists and global warming alarmists that polar bears are at risk because of man-made global warming.
The next stupid thing the Bush administration did was make an attempt at changing the rules in the middle of the game. How childish is that? What they did was say, “There, we’ve place the polar bear on THE list (I hope that makes you happy) but you can’t use any claims that environmental projects will affect the polar bear.” What that was supposed to mean is that if someone in East Overshoe wants to build a new coal-fired power plant, you can’t deny the project because the emissions from the plant might further harm the polar bear.
Anyone with half a brain knew that would hold no water. It’s a classic example of how science, including wildlife science, is scared to death of the environmentalists and have no backbone to deal with them. Consequently science is no longer viable and effective in dealing with such matters.
Moving up to the present, we now have a far left administration running this country and it is bent on reversing anything and everything President Bush did, if for no other reason than for hateful spite. Just the other day the U.S. Senate voted 52-42 (I wonder where the other 6 senators where.) to rescind the action of the previous administration. Now, prepare for the enviros to line up at the court house in attempts to stop any and all construction projects they don’t like. And that’s only the beginning.
What essentially has happened is that the polar bear is now the largest, most powerful instrument that has ever existed and it lies at the disposal of the environmental community. And in case you haven’t figured it out yet, this isn’t about saving the polar bear. It’s about gaining control.
How extreme will the actions become? That’s really anyone’s guess but the potential is there. Hugh Hewitt, Townhall contributor, former ESA lawyer under the Reagan administration and current private ESA/Environmental lawyer, says that any federal permit could be challenged in court.
When a final spending bill passes next week or the week thereafter, the polar bear will be just another endangered species, and any federal permit that can be argued to impact the species –say by allowing greenhouse gases to be emitted in greater quantities in connection with offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico– will have to pass through a “consultation” with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. Environmental groups can sue to force such consultations. Such consultations are very expensive and time consuming, and while the polar bear’s huge shadow on the lower 48 will be very good for my law practice, it will be very bad for an economy in recession.
We have learned over the years that the courts overwhelmingly fall on the side of environmentalists and a lot of the reason for that has come from “interpreting” the Endangered Species Act. This is why I favor reform of the Act but that’s another day.
Everyone wants to protect the polar bear but there are many scientists who say the bear doesn’t need anymore protection than it had before it was listed as threatened. The Bush move was bad and now coupled with this recent vote in the Senate, don’t be surprised when you read in the press or see on television about the first lawsuit demanding enforcement of the Endangered Species Act because of the effects of man-made global warming.
With a small percentage of President Obama’s “stimulus” bill directed at construction, one has to wonder if any of these projects will be held up because of this vote.
How far will it go and where will it end up?
Tom Remington
Related Articles
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
We feature the latest news, events and politics effecting the sports of hunting, fishing, and all outdoor activities in North America.
[...] week I made this statement in regards to the U.S. Senate’s vote to overturn the Bush administration’s restrictions [...]
[...] week I made this statement in regards to the U.S. Senate’s vote to overturn the Bush administration’s restrictions [...]
The Federal Fish and Wildlife Service has recently changed its interpretation of the Endangered Species Act to attack mining, particularly coal mining. Unlike the previous rules which allowed mining companies to coexist with the Indiana Bat, Fish and Wildlife now wants the Indiana Bat to not have to share its habitat . This is being done by demanding, as a condition of permit issuance for any proposed mining site found to be within 10 miles of an Indiana Bat hibernating place, that any Indiana Bat habitat (woods) proposed to be disturbed be replaced on or adjacent to the proposed site at a two to one ratio and that the replacement habitat be permanently protected through conservation easements so that no other use that conflicts with bat habitat is possible. If that is not possible an off-site wooded area that is at least 50 years old can be deeded to a conservancy for permanent protection. These rules are not possible to comply with and will kill most of the mining projects proposed within these areas.
The scope of this problem may be more appreciated when one realizes that a 10 mile radius of protection for an Indiana Bat hibernaculum is equal to 200,000 acres. In Pennsylvania, where the number of these hibernaculums have increased from 10 in 2003 to 17 in 2007, this means a potential of 3,400,000 acres of mining is suddenly off-limits. That’s a lot of jobs lost, just when we can ill-afford it. It is also a huge taking of land relative to mineral owners who were planning to benefit from mining. And, it is absolutely in opposition to the goal of energy independence!
This looks like a part of Nick Rahall’s Bill-H.R. 699. This anti Mining Bill is nation wide, Of course everything these goobers are doing is counter Declaration of Independence via Agenda 21-Sustainable Development-Smart Growth– This crashing orchestrated economy is taking us into the POST INDUSTRIAL AGE..The enviro movement is and always has been about protecting resources for foreign bankers, as those are collateral for their fake debt.. H.R. 699 should be called H.R. 666….The world’s politico are dropping THORS HAMMER folks…which is the SWASTIKA….No more VELVET gloves soon…The ESA was scam from the get go…It’s all in the IRON MOUNTAIN REPORT of 1967—No one listened and now bang, the shit is hitting the fan..