Maine Lawmakers Seek To Trample On Rights Ban High-Fence Hunting
February 17, 2009
Americans are guaranteed under the United States Constitution to be able to work hard and make a living. As this country spirals deeper and deeper into a form of European-style socialism, individual rights, including the right to prosper, are being yanked out from under American citizens for no good reason.
The state of Maine has become the target of animal rights groups for years. Maine, once a staunchly independent state, continues to morph into a land very attractive to secular progressives bent on the destruction of the liberties fought and died for in this country.
Maine has several deer, elk and bison ranches scattered across the state. A handful of those ranches offer anyone who has the interest, a chance to shoot one of these critters. This action has been dubbed the name of high-fence hunting. Once again a group of Maine lawmakers has put together a bill proposal that would repeal Chapter 202-A of Maine law, effectively banning the shooting of any of these animals on private land.
High-fence hunting has been the target of controversy in several states. The arguments used against ranch or preserve hunting are weak and misleading. In states that have been successful in winning the war against the animal rights activists have done so because they were able to get the truth to the voters. Maine will be no different. The truth must be made known.
History has shown us in this battle for private property rights that once voters are given the facts and understand the truth that exists, Americans win. In this case, Mainers are going to have to contact their state representatives and tell them not to be lured into this rights-stripping bill.
Don’t let anyone try to convince you that this is NOT a case of protecting constitutional rights. It is clearly that. Those fighting to stop ranch hunting hide behind hunting ethics, animal cruelty and often whip up a scare or two over disease. None of these excuses stand up to rational scrutiny.
Hunting ethics is extremely subjective, it’s a personal perspective, all guided with the rules that govern the sport. Those rules are crafted from the need to properly manage the game animals and provide for public safety.
We too often hear that fair chase hunting ethics is of the biggest concern to both hunters and non-hunters. While ethics certainly is important and is a integral part of what shapes our sport, it is far from a leading candidate of what is endangering hunting. Land access, costs, and available time to be in the field are the three major events that cause more damage to the sports of hunting and fishing than anything else.
When we begin legislating ethics, that is when individuals are attempting to set the moral standards by how others should live. Is that what we want? In all honesty if a handful of Maine legislators believes hunting on a game preserve is unethical, then we would have to just as honestly ask, why pick on preserve hunting? Shouldn’t be ban smoking? Shouldn’t we shut down bars, topless dance clubs, and remove any and all questionable magazines from our newsstands? How much more can we add to this list?
The truth is there is no real clear and necessary reason to stop a private citizen from trying to find a way to make a living by the utilization of his own land to raise domestic livestock and harvest it in the manner he would choose. LD 560 is nothing more than the effort of a handful of Maine lawmakers to push their personal ideals onto others. Join the fight to stop this attack on our rights. It’s not about whether you approve or disapprove of high-fence hunting. Do you want to be a part of the ethics Nazis? This is about rights…..your rights as a free American.
Mark Luce is owner of Hindsite Hunt Preserve in Newport, Maine. Mark is seeking the help and support of other who place value on property rights and our hunting heritage.
As a preserve owner in Maine who has made a substantial investment to keep our land in agriculture we are being attacked once again. The harvesting of these animals is far more humane than trucking the same animals to a slaughter facility. Those who speak negative about preserves do so with propaganda supplied to them by the anti hunting groups.
At a time when jobs are scarce and money is tight these antis want to put us out of business. They have submitted a bill, L.D. 560 to ban our preserves. This only the tip of the iceberg re: there true mission..BAN ALL HUNTING!
We as Preserve Owners would appreciate any support from the public that we can muster. Write your local Rep, our Governor and attend the public hearing.
Mark Luce has operated a first class business for several years and has invested huge sums of money looking for a return that will help pay for his economically stressed business. He pays $1,000.00 a year for his license and $25 for each animal that is harvested. The facility is inspected each year and Mark has to pay to have each animal taken tested for disease, including chronic wasting disease.
Luce tells me that he is one of the smaller facilities in the state and his feeding costs now run $680.00 every 10 days. He offers his hunts, as do many of the ranch owners, as a means of generating much needed revenue.
Often lost in these kinds of debates is the fact that Mark Luce is an American. He’s a human being with family trying to eke out a living just like everyone else. It is appalling that anyone, including lawmakers, often with their holier-than-thou attitudes, introduce bills that will legislate a family right out of business.
I helped the Idaho Elk Breeders Association fight similar attacks a few years ago. While I immediately saw through the deceitful tactics of those trying to shut down the elk industry in Idaho, it wasn’t until I traveled to Idaho and met with some of the people and their families did it really come home to roost for me. These are good Americans. Hard working people, some who have lost family members fighting to keep America free from the dictatorial efforts of some bent on the destruction of our freedom. Help do your part. Get involved now!
Sponsors and cosponsors of this bill are:
Sponsored By: Representative CASAVANT of Biddeford
Cosponsored By: Representative BOLAND of Sanford
Representative EBERLE of South Portland
Senator GERZOFSKY of Cumberland
Representative GILES of Belfast
Representative MAZUREK of Rockland
Senator NUTTING of Androscoggin
Representative ROTUNDO of Lewiston
Representative RUSSELL of Portland
Representative TRINWARD of Waterville
Get on the phone now! Call these people and your own representative. Call the governor’s office. Tell them you support the freedoms and liberties of Americans and that you believe Mark Luce and all the other preserve owners have a legal right to ranch deer, elk and bison and that they can decide how their livestock will be harvested.
Tom Remington
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
We feature the latest news, events and politics effecting the sports of hunting, fishing, and all outdoor activities in North America.
I don’t see where the lawmakers have any right to tell a person what or what they cannot do on there own land if they’re following current state laws,just because they don’t think it’s the right thing to do.We have to many unnecessary laws now.
He provides a service that many of us can afford and might want to do someday versus having to fly the world over to be able to harvest the animals he has.
It’s another way for them to hastle gun owners rights.Law makers why don’t you mind your own business,we have many more important things to tackle than this.
It always seems to me that hunters are like farmers in many ways…..they both love the land, and they are both independent and self sufficient in many ways..I think that we both suffer the same problem from our independent thinking, though, and that is we both are never that well organized and united in our efforts to protect ourselves and our way of life…..
The antis are both organized and communal in thinking, and they are able to organize their agendas efficiently because of it. And when they are successful, we are not! Somewhere down the line, we as hunters have to be able to organize and overcome the advances of the those who would take away our rights and our way of life….before they are gone forever! For once they are gone, the next generation will not know they even existed, and will never know the freedom and heritage they are missing……
What these fanatics want to do to a licensed business after we have all spent thousands of dollars because we were granted a licence by the State of Maine is purely a waste of valuable time and money.
This comes at a time when the country as a whole is experiencing an economic melt down and like domino’s , the domino effect is wide spread. When the farmer who I buy $680 worth of wrapped balage from every ten days lose’s my business, tell me that won’t impact him……..He’ll tell you it will….and the domino’s keep falling!
Siding with the antis is akin to opposing all hunting….They do!
We are just the current target of their on-going agenda to stop all hunting.
They would like to shut down slaughter houses as well!
This Bill L.D. 560 is an anti small business, anti farming , anti land rights issue!………….Pure and simple!
Please contact these members of the Ag. Committee and let them know how you feel…..
Thanks, Mark Luce http://www.hindsite-deer.com
http://www.maine.gov/legis/house/jt_com/acf.htm
Joint Standing Committee on
Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry
Senator John M. Nutting (D-Androscoggin), Chair
Senator Bruce S. Bryant (D-Oxford)
Senator Roger L. Sherman (R-Aroostook)
Representative Wendy Pieh (D-Bremen), Chair
Representative Nancy E. Smith (D-Monmouth)
Representative Benjamin Marriner Pratt (D-Eddington)
Representative Leila J. Percy (D-Phippsburg)
Representative Peter S. Kent (D-Woolwich)
Representative Jeff M. McCabe (D-Skowhegan)
Representative Andrew Roesing O’Brien (D-Lincolnville)
Representative Peter E. Edgecomb (R-Caribou)*
Representative Dean A. Cray (R-Palmyra)
Representative Jeffery Allen Gifford (R-Lincoln)
[...] would ban shooting animals on private land. In her piece she quotes only part of what I said in an article I wrote about the nonsense of trying to legislate one’s ethical [...]
[...] would ban shooting animals on private land. In her piece she quotes only part of what I said in an article I wrote about the nonsense of trying to legislate one’s ethical [...]