Attempting To Discredit Justice Scalia
September 28, 2008
The Associated Press is doing what it does best in presenting stories that are not representative of the claims they make. In an attempt to smear Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the AP claims that conservative judges disagree with Scalia on his opinion in District of Columbia vs. Heller. They found two, one with sour grapes over not getting nominated by Bush to fill a vacancy in 2005.
The AP claims that these two conservatives accuse Scalia’s ruling as being “activism” and that the court should have taken the same position as Roe v Wade and let the states decide what is best. I do see one big difference. In Roe v Wade the decision is whether or not to allow a woman the right to decide whether to kill her unborn baby and in District of Columbia v Heller, it’s about interpreting the Second Amendment. No conservative judge would consider allowing states to disregard the U.S. Constitution.
Tom Remington
Check Out Related Articles
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
We feature the latest news, events and politics effecting the sports of hunting, fishing, and all outdoor activities in North America.
It only goes to show you just how close we came to losing our 2nd Amendment rights….4-5 is a hair’s breath…the next generation or two may not be as “traditional” as ours is!
At least we won’t be alive to see it if it happens!
The “sheeple”, in each generation are beginning to value both “freedom” and “independence”, less and less, and are turning more and more to the affluent “party” life, with less moral values, and less concern with God given rights and principles.
If it ever comes down to losing those 2nd Amendment rights, enough of us who value our freedoms more than a life under the thumb of immoral government, may have to make the supreme sacrifice, to make the cost of tyranny high…from our cold dead hands….If it ever comes to that day, write me on the list, I will be ready, but not without regret.