Is McCain Stupid? Or Does He Think We Are?
Posted by Tom Remington on May 13, 2008
It’s looking more and more like come next November when we all walk into that polling booth our choices for the next president of the United States of America will be Barack Hussein Obama or Al Gore! That’s right Al Gore. John McCain is trying desperately to paint himself as a conservative while at the same time pandering for votes from anywhere he can get them (like this is some new political strategy).
The question we all need to ask is whether or not John McCain is really believes the comments he made yesterday while delivering a speech in Oregon.
Today I’d like to focus on just one of those challenges, and among environmental dangers it is surely the most serious of all. Whether we call it “climate change” or “global warming,” in the end we’re all left with the same set of facts. The facts of global warming demand our urgent attention, especially in Washington. Good stewardship, prudence, and simple commonsense demand that we to act meet the challenge, and act quickly.
This sounds like Al Gore! Is McCain living in a bubble since he announced his candidacy? “We’re all left with the same set of facts”? Come on! That’s a bunch of malarkey. Everyday there is more and more scientific evidence that shows us that any climate changes we are experiencing are natural and cyclical.
In November you can decide which global warming alarmist you want who will cost American taxpayers billions of dollars on a hoax started by a loser politician.
I’ll put my money on science.
Tom Remington
If you enjoyed this article check these out:
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Now, Tom, stupid is as stupid does…(give Forrest Gump some credit, after all) The facts are that he needs all the allies he can get, same as any politician. Fact is also that there has been and still is global warming. (He was quick to qualify that: “climate change”.) Just how much of that is caused by man is another question. I give the man a LOT more credit than the other party. How many of them served in the military, much less as POW’s who let others be released before he would go free himself? Check out his war record as well as his military record. http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/navy-releases-mccains-military-record/20080508102809990001
Strange I feel like defending a man who I thought was less of a conservative than any of the others…but at least he claims to be a conservative…consider the options!
May 13th, 2008 at 10:31 am
[...] Continue Reading [...]
May 13th, 2008 at 10:42 am
So by saying its cyclical climate change, does that mean we get to keep on polluting, using as much fuel and electricity as possible and generally continuing to behave as if the earth is our own personal dumping ground with endless reserves of everything we want?
Yeah. I didn’t think so. So whatever we CALL it, we need to make some changes. The “name argument” is simply a way to waste time and deflect change that most of us are too lazy to enact.
Just my two cents.
May 13th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
You’re talking about two separate issues. Global warming as being anthropogenic or man made is complete different subject matter than pollution and energy use. But those promoting that global warming as the result of carbon dioxide produced by man will not tell you the difference between what is factual and what is not.
When someone wants to dispute the Al Gore theory of global warming, you assume that I/we think polluting and doing nothing about the energy problem is what we espouse to. Not true!
As long as we live in a society that is run by the environmentalists, we will NEVER be able to solve any alternative energy problems. No nukes, no windmills, no solar panels, no drilling, no new power plants, no new refineries, no, no, no, no, no. All the while we spiral into submission to the oil producing countries, pay the higher gas prices and continue with business as usual blaming BIG OIL and George Bush!
May 13th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
In a preview of the speech, CNN reports that McCain will say: “We stand warned by serious and credible scientists across the world that time is short and the dangers are great. The most relevant question now is whether our own government is equal to the challenge.”
No, Sen. McCain, the most relevant question is whether political leaders will have the diligence to study this issue and the integrity and courage to stand up to the propaganda of the enviro-bullies. The question is whether you can be a maverick where it counts.
It is not Earth’s ecosystem that hangs in the balance, but America’s future. Those whose vision isn’t blurred by green-colored glasses and the temptation to win accolades from the leftist-dominated culture can see that the global push to “save the planet” is more about destroying capitalism, private property and Western culture than sound, science-based environmental stewardship. Never mind the staggering contradiction that free market economies produce cleaner environs.
May 13th, 2008 at 2:56 pm
Much applause! Much applause! Kudos!
May 13th, 2008 at 3:02 pm
While I do agree with you on some points, there is no nation in the world that has true free markets.
May 15th, 2008 at 11:05 am